Saturday, January 24, 2015

Greece at the National Elections’ Crossroads: A Step Towards Left or Right?

By

RIEAS Senior advisor based in Athens, Greece and Associate at the Centre for Strategic Studies, University of Jordan
Director of the Research Institute for European and American Studies based in Athens, Greece
Copyright: Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC); http://russiancouncil.ru/en/inner/?id_4=5136#top
First Published: 23 January 2015


The upcoming January 25, 2015 national elections in Greece highlight a major challenge as they present a struggle between anger against austerity and fear of euro exit. The apparent reason that led to early national elections is the failure of the coalition government to obtain a parliamentary majority to appoint a candidate as president of the Republic [1] . The hidden motive behind the declaration of early elections however was the volatile political landscape that made strenuous coalition government’s compliance with the Troika’s tough agenda thus postponing structural policy reforms by fear of the social effects that could be translated into high political cost. The Greek Prime Minister was between Scylla and Charybdis in terms of sustaining the coalition government and meeting Troika’s demands for unimpeded economic support.



The majority of polls show that SYRIZA, the main opposition party that has engulfed supporters from radical leftists to socialists in an effort to broaden its electoral base, will maintain a clear lead with percentages ranging from 28 to 31, while the ruling New Democracy’s performance ranges from 23 to 28 % [2]. The coalition partner PASOK continues to shrink from the 2009 voter turnout of 43.92 % to 12.28 % in the 2012 national elections. A progressive shrinkage is recorded for center-left DIMAR, formerly coalition partner, with limited chances to enter parliament because of the alibi it offered to the coalition government’s strict austerity policies [3]. Polls also suggest that the Communist party of KKE, the liberal party of The River, and the nationalist Golden Dawn are certain to enter parliament.
The formation of a majority government is a spinous matter because of the partisan fragmentation and the existent electoral law which although awards a 50 bonus seat to the winning party, it simultaneously conditions the ability to form a majority on the voter turnout of political parties that remain outside parliament [4]. In case that no party forms a majority government, the Greek President will have to give order to the winning party’s leader to form a coalition within three days, and if he fails the same process will be followed with the second and third parties’ leaders. In the event of a failure, a second round of elections has to be held within a month [5].
The prospect of political instability has generated a cataract of reactions that have directly affected the country’s economy with most prominent investors’ selling Greek bonds and stocks. Greek stocks have fallen 24 % since early December 2014 when national elections were declared for early 2015 instead of 2016 as originally scheduled. The Athens Stock Exchange slipped on January 5, 2015 to its lowest level since November 2012. Greek bonds have lost 7.4 % over the same period presenting the worst performance of 34 sovereign securities tracked by Bloomberg's World Bond Index [6].
instamun.org/greeces-political-crisis-might-
force-it-out-of-the-euro
Greek elections results and opinion polls,
Jan 2, 2015
Election campaigns’ intensity to affect voting intention differs significantly from one another and differences are meant to have far-reaching consequences for the cognitive strategies used by Greek voters. Throughout the election campaign, the essence is that the ruling party centers on a “roadmap” of measures for a “post-bailout Greece” concurrently using fear factors such as default and euro exit, while the major opposition relies on anti-austerity whilst unfolding a citizen-centric tactics.
The ruling party highlights that Greece has emerged from a six-year recession with the achievement of primary surplus and that the focus has already shifted on a growth plan for post-crisis which entails gradual tax reduction across middle-class households, support of the shipping, energy, pharmaceuticals and technology sectors, introduction of additional reforms to restrict bureaucracy and of an investment incentives’ package that foresees reduction of production costs and social security contributions. At the same time, the ruling party bases its campaign on fear factors with the aim to moderate austerity-produced public anger, with most protrusive an argument that Greece would be led to default and exit from the European single currency by the declared policies of the major opposition.
A chain reaction was almost instantly triggered in the form of large-scale bank withdrawals amounting to €7 billion since December 2014 ahead of the January 25, 2015 elections according to data published by the Bank of Greece with large companies and individuals being the first to heave deposits [7]. The pressing liquidity conditions, as consequence of the growing outflow of deposits and the issue of treasury bills (T-bills) imposed by the State, have driven the country’s systemic banks to request cash from the Bank of Greece through the emergency liquidity system (ELA) [8].

Reuters
Prime Minister of Greece and leader of New
Democracy Antonis Samaras
SYRIZA for its part attempts to display a strategy of image normalization prescribing a political program advertised as a viable alternative without endangering euro membership, in a country where unemployment has reached almost 1.5 million of a labor force of 4.5 million, incomes have declined to an approximate average of 50 %, hospitals are understaffed with lack of nurses and medical doctors, and working conditions are governed not only by three or five month temporary contracts but also by rented employees who receive freelancing rather than regular payments. The major opposition’s political proposals revolve around debt renegotiation aiming at partial debt relief, the fight against austerity with the gradual reintroduction of the minimum wage of €751 [9] , income redistribution through a radical tax system, debt restructuring for the most vulnerable households, and restoration of market liquidity by means of state control of the banking system. In a calculated attempt to broaden its electoral base, the major opposition has appealed to reluctant conservative social groups and devout Christians with the conduct of its leader’s visit to Mount Athos in summer 2014 and his participation in the public ritual of Epiphany in early January 2015 [10].
At a time when Southern European countries and France oppose the German-led austerity orthodoxy, a series of questions emerge and are related to the next Greek government’s strategy vis-à-vis Troika to secure ''trade-offs'' among issues that currently appear to be uncompromised with most prevailing the following: Does Greece really need debt relief? Is a euro exit possible? Can the vicious cycle of deflation that Greece faces be defeated and how?
There is little doubt that the country’s debt-servicing bill declined because private financial investors have been replaced by Eurozone countries which currently own 60 % of Greece’s €322 billion government debt that equals to 179% of GDP [11]. The concluded extension of the country’s repayments to 2054 and the cut in interest payments is considered by many as equivalent to a haircut. Scepticism, however, seems to prevail when it comes to the feasibility of the country’s debt, in accordance with the official Eurozone projection, to fall as share of its GDP below 124 % in coming years [12] for three main reasons: First, growth forecasts are considered overly optimistic given that they predict nominal GDP growth of approximately 5 % annually from 2016 till 2020. Second, the hypothesis that Greece will achieve annual primary budget surplus equivalent to 4 % of the GDP is viewed as unrealized. Third, the crisis has migrated to the real economy in the form of deflation that makes Greece unsustainable given that, in 2014 alone, real interest rates exceeded 3 % due to the prices’ fall by 2.6 %[13].

Statista.com
That said, any debt restructuring process needs to maximize benefits based on a mutual agreement between Greece, the EU and the IMF so that a new deal renders Greece sustainable thus creating a precedent for sorting out Eurozone’s problems. The Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT) program of the European Central Bank (ECB) endorsed recently by the European Court [14] , which provides the purchase of hundreds of billions of Eurozone countries’ sovereign bonds on secondary markets, presents an enhancement in the bargaining power of any new elected Greek government and also advances the ECB’s plans for significant quantitative easing against the forces of deflation [15]. Specifically, the OMT program is appropriate to reduce interest rates on government bonds restoring significantly financial normality to states concerned, thus permitting the ECB to exert monetary policies in an environment of greater stability [16]. When it comes to the possibility of a Greek exit from the Eurozone, the challenges that may accrue can prove multifold. Although a Greek exit will not be a systemic event causing a simultaneous breakdown in global confidence and trade as evidenced in the wake of the Lehman Brothers collapse, the travails of Europe will unquestionably impact the global stock markets and will send waves of shock to global confidence. Equally important, the risk of contagion will increase, despite the various rescue mechanisms, and European policy makers will have to “circle the wagons” around the other periphery countries to cease occurrence. In other words, Greece could create a massive shock for financial markets and despite the fact that an exit from the eurozone is complicated technically, it could result in contagion because financial investors would try to test other Eurozone countries.
A way out of the crisis, which has penetrated the European foundations, entails a debate on the kind of Europe that all member states envision. Greece and its new-to-be-elected government could play a vital role in shaping the European debate away from populist slogans by fostering partnerships for a universally beneficial deal that could make European countries and their economies sustainable. In essence, at the end of the day, Europe is offered the chance to “write her injuries in dust, but her benefits in marble” [17].

References:

1. Stavros Dimas was appointed as presidential candidate and attracted the support of 168 MPs out of the 300, short of the 180 required votes. In accordance with the Greek constitution, the parliament was dissolved and January 25, 2015 was set as date for the conduct of national elections.
2. “Seven Party Parliament with No Majority”, Proto Thema (Daily) , 19 January 2015
3. F. Chatzistavrou and S. Michalaki, “Reshaping Politics of the Left and Centre in Greece after the 2014 EP Election”, EPIN Commentary, No.21, 110 September 2014.
4. Paris Ayiomamitis, “Greek Election Math and Scenarios: A Handy Guide”, The Press Project, 8 January 2015
5. Ibid. The Greek president will have to appoint the head of the Supreme Court as prime minister, the parliament will dissolve and a caretaker government will be established so that the second round of elections takes place.
6. Jonathan Stearns and Nikos Chrysoloras. “Samaras Faces Greek Voters Skeptical of His Euro-Exit Warnings”, Washington Post (Daily), January 5, 2015
7. “Seven Billion Euro in Outflows after the Declaration of Elections”, Proto Thema (Daily), January 19, 2015
8. The repeated issue of T-bills has caused a major blow to the Greek banking system’s liquidity as it is evidenced by the State raise of €2.7 billion in November 2014, the secure of €3.2 billion in December 2014 and the reserve of €2.7 billion in January 2015. Yiannis Papadoyiannis, “Greek Banks Make Requests for ELA Funding”, Kathimerini (Daily), January 16, 2015.
9. “Syriza’s First Act in Office: Raise Minimum Wage”, The Times of Change (News and Media Network), January 16, 2015
10. “Epiphany for the Greek Left: Spreading His Wings”, The Economist, January 6, 2015.
11. Dimitra Defotis, “Greek Victor: Debt Relief”, Barron’s (Magazine Weekly Edition), January 17, 2015.
12. Stephen Fidler, “Politics Risk Tripping Up Greece on Debt Relief”, Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2015
13. Ibid.
14. Court of Justice of the European Union, Press Release No 2/15 Luxembourg, 14 January 2015.
15. Jana Randow, “Europe’s QE Quandary”, Bloomberg, December 30, 2015.
16. Yanis Varoufakis, “On the ECB’s Latest Contradiction (And How It Helps Greece)”, January 15, 2015. Accessed at: http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2015/01/15/on-the-ecbs-great-contradiction-and-how-it-helps-greece/
17. Paraphrase of a quote by Benjamin Franklin.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

The Resolution of the Cyprus Conflict: A Catalyst for East Mediterranean Security and Cooperation

By:
Antonia DimouRIEAS Senior advisor based in Athens, Greece and Associate at the Centre for Strategic Studies, University of Jordan
John NomikosDirector of the Research Institute for European and American Studies based in Athens, Greec
Copyright: Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC)*
First Publication: 17 October, 2014
The East Mediterranean is on the frontlines of a struggle for peace and economic development where Cyprus holds a central position of geographical and functional importance in terms of security, including energy security. The role of Cyprus in regional security as a host of military operations, including Afghanistan and Kuwait, and as the holder of the British sovereign bases have turned it into an indispensable partner of the West. The island has large expatriate populations from mainland Greece, Russia and the UK, maintains vital economic interests in the wider Middle East, but remains partially occupied by Turkey which has dispatched thousands of soldiers for the protection of an increasing expatriate population of Turkish nationals on the northern part of the island.
Photo: REUTERS/Neil Hall

A watchtower stands along the United Nations

buffer zone in the district of Famagusta, northern Cyprus
The resolution of the Cyprus conflict poses a major challenge given that it is at core not only of solving regional disputes but most importantly of western security strategies. These strategies are outlined in the post-Arab spring era in light of the Syrian conflict, the collapse of Turkey’s foreign policy of “zero-problems-with neighbours”, and the emergence of radical organisations like ISIS that have become powerful in the East Mediterranean. It is in this context that an unprecedented engagement with the Cyprus issue is witnessed throughout 2014 and includes the first time visit in 52 years of an incumbent American vice-president as well as other EU and US high-level visits.
The game changer in resolving the conflict is that Cyprus has the potential to serve as a major energy supplier for Europe and Asia as well as can set the pattern for resolving the Palestinian-Israeli dispute which climaxed this summer with the Gaza war.
 Photo: wikipedia.org 

The gas proven discoveries in Cyprus Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) can definitely contribute to the reduction of the island’s dependence on foreign energy and create prospects for economic advantages given that natural gas is the major source of direct income to the state treasury due to royalties and taxes paid by gas suppliers. International companies like Noble Energy, ENI and KOGAS hold prospecting concessions on offshore blocks 12, 2, 3 and 9 of the Cyprus EEZ. Besides, major oilfield services companies like Halliburton and Schlumberger have based operations for the East Mediterranean in Cyprus, thus providing a vote of confidence regarding the island’s regional energy standing.
Cyprus, however, faces challenges concerning monetizing natural gas resources that are associated with regional export options, such as the pipeline project that would connect regional fields with the Turkish coast. This export option presupposes the resolution of the Cyprus conflict since any pipeline would have to cross Cyprus’s EEZ. Even in the absence of resolution on the Cyprus long-standing conflict, without the existence of mutually agreed maritime boundaries, any possibility of regional development of offshore energy resources becomes difficult. This reality coupled with Turkey’s attempt to capitalize on its conventional military superiority to force energy issues by military action, along with its adoption of a controversial policy when it comes to the delimitation of maritime boundaries, have motivated the search of a breakthrough in the strategic impasse over the island still divided between the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot communities.
Note that Ankara’s energy policies are affected by the situation in the Aegean, where Turkish-Greek negotiations on maritime border demarcation based on the median line principle would deprive it of access to extensive continental shelf rights throughout the Eastern Mediterranean. It is for this reason that Turkey prefers the principle of equity when it comes to the East Mediterranean delimitation of maritime boundaries, but has adopted the principle of median line in the Black Sea.
When it comes to geopolitical reasons for supporting the Cyprus conflict solution which could also serve as the basis for an Israeli-Palestinian settlement, the most relevant are as follows:
First, a Cyprus partition is not deemed beneficial for either country in the region. The 1947 Indo-Pakistani partition is a good example. Though accepted by both sides, it was accompanied by an arms race that has ultimately turned into a nuclear rivalry. Having this model in mind, it is not difficult to understand that the ongoing arms race in Cyprus would guarantee further instability in the wider region.
Photo: community.eldis.org
Another major concern is the possibility of the emergence of fundamental Islamic tides in Northern Cyprus. In case of partition, radicalization of Islamic elements in Northern Cyprus as a result of economic or political unrest is a possible development that runs contrary to the regional security.
Additionally, the possibility of the permanent division of the Cypriot capital will constitute a detrimental development for Israel and the Palestinians, as the current status in Nicosia is similar to the pre-1967 partition of Jerusalem. The Cyprus partition would constitute a bad precedent for the Israeli and Palestinian claims over an undivided Jerusalem, which is one of the major issues to be tackled in any final Arab–Israeli peace agreement. On the contrary, a federal solution would unite Nicosia and could strengthen Israel's and the Palestinians' case for a similar preferred position on the final status of Jerusalem.
Though in a different context, a shared rule arrangement in Cyprus could also be the model for a broader regional structure between Israel and its closest neighbours, namely the Palestinians and Jordan.
Obviously, intensified Western diplomacy that is directed towards resolving the Cyprus issue for an agreement on the political future of the island, will undoubtedly have positive spill-over effects on strategies that can bring the benefits of security and economic gains in the East Mediterranean. With no doubt, time is of essence…
*The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC) is a non-profit academic and diplomatic think tank that was founded by the Russian Federation Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Education and Science in 2010.
** The article in also available in the Russian language at: http://russiancouncil.ru/inner/?id_4=4626#top 

Monday, September 22, 2014

ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΙΣΛΑΜΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΑΣΚΕΨΗΣ: ΕΝΙΣΧΥΣΗ ΝΕΟΘΩΜΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΘΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ

της Αντωνίας Δήμου
(Σύμβουλος στο Ινστιτούτο Ευρωπαϊκών και Αμερικανικών Σπουδών (RIEAS) και εταίρος στο Κέντρο για την Ανάπτυξη στη Μέση Ανατολή του Πανεπιστημίου της Καλιφόρνια, Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες)


Copyright: Research Institute for European and American Studies (www.rieas.gr) Publication Date: 8 September 2014

Η 41η Διάσκεψη των ΥΠΕΞ του Οργανισμού Ισλαμικής Διάσκεψης (ΟΙΔ) που πραγματοποιήθηκε στη Τζέντα της Σαουδικής Αραβίας από τις 18 έως τις 19 Ιουνίου 2014 εξέδωσε δύο αποφάσεις που λήφθηκαν από την ολομέ-λεια του Οργανισμού, οι οποίες εγγίζουν άμεσα την Ελλάδα και την Κύπρο. Η πρώτη απόφαση φέρει τίτλο «η Κατάσταση στην Κύπρο» (Res. No19/41 POL), και η δεύτερη τιτλοπορείται ως: «η Κατάσταση της Τουρκο-μουσουλμανικής Μειονότητας στη Δυτική Θράκη και του Μουσουλμανικού Πληθυσμού της Δωδεκανήσου» (Res. No 3/41-MM)..... Read more

Monday, September 1, 2014

NATIONAL SECURITY & ANALYSIS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION - RIEAS

The Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) organized the 1st Executive Security Training Seminar entitled: "National Security and Intelligence Analysis in the Mediterranean Region". The training seminar, which took place in an Athenian hotel on 7th-10th July 2014, is part of the activities that are planned, implemented and supported organizationally by the Research Institute for European and American Studies... Read more

Conference Proceedings; 
Edited by Antonia Dimou 
                      & 
Antonia Chatzopoulou




PREFACE

The Mediterranean is a geopolitically significant region which is, however, overwhelmed by security problems considered as vital ranging from interstate conflicts, intrastate crises and transnational threats with most prominent the proliferation of conventional and mass destruction weapons, cyber-warfare and terrorism. A comprehensive approach to security in the Mediterranean, including hard security-soft security integration and civil-military-private sector coordination is the key to stability.  

If the imperative for concord over instability prevails, then the dividents that will accrue in the entire Mediterranean will be multifold.  What some of the threats to stability present, the level of their complexities and whether they can be coped  efficiently under the current regional exigencies as evidenced in Syria and Libya, have led to the formation of the agenda of the 1st training executive seminar of the Research  Institute for European and American Studies.

An underlying theme of the seminar has been security as a prerequisite for foreign direct investment that can help overcome the legacies, psychological and otherwise that have burdened the Greek and other regional economies for so long. As it is widely acknowledged, issues of national security related to poor governance affect international economic transactions and have become more complicated after September 11th, 2001 when the term was expanded to include human security in the context of international trade.

Equally primary topic has been the presentation of the challenges related to CBRN risks and the illegal export of sensitive military technology as well as the outline of a series of effective strategies to mitigate risks through coordination of different national agencies like the intelligence communities, and cooperation between regional countries and international organizations. 

In articulating their presentations, instructors made no pretense to providing answers to complex issues addressed. As the chairman of the executive seminar noted in his concluding remarks, “instructors treated their topics with sincerity and clarity, and thus increased our understanding of the complex issues involved”.

This precisely has been the goal of the Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS). In the context of its training activities, RIEAS sustains keen interest in the affairs of the Mediterranean region and supports a holistic approach to security encouraging cooperation and dialogue to identify contemporary risks and provide solutions.

The current publication of the summary of the conference proceedings serves as guide to the instructors’ information sharing and presentations with focus on the multi-dimensional challenges facing the Mediterranean.

Be that as it may, challenges still lie ahead…


Antonia Dimou,                                                                                                               Editor                                                                                                                          
August 2014

Thursday, August 28, 2014

INTELLIGENCE AND BUILDING OF DEMOCRACY IN JORDAN

By Antonia Dimou
(RIEAS Senior Advisor and Associate at the CSS, University of Jordan)


Reproduced by the Research Institute for European and American Studies (www.rieas.gr) Publication Date: 27 August 2014)

The relationship between democracy and the character of secret intelligence presents a composite two-sided puzzle. On the one side, the very concept of democracy demands that an intelligence agency serves democratic interests by providing one country's security and preparedness against potential threats both internal and external. The core notion is that a stronger country can turn itself into a heaven where democracy can continue to be practiced. On the other side, intelligence investigative methods in many countries occur outside the context of democratic control and oversight mechanisms, thus surfacing an inherent conflict.

That said the role of intelligence in the building of democracy and political stability in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is crucial. Jordan, strategically located in the Middle East, presents a long-run import-export relationship. On the one hand, Jordan, a country of few natural resources, imports oil products and natural gas to meet its energy needs. On the other hand, Jordan exports a valuable resource which is security in terms of intelligence, geographic security, and stability...... Read more

Monday, August 25, 2014

Antonia Dimou: "Jordan and the Security Challenges of the Arab Spring"



*Speech delivered in the context of the 2013 Annual IIHA Conference that was organised in Athens, 21-23 June 2013.  

Friday, August 22, 2014

Interview excerpts

Interview excerpts of Antonia Dimou, Associate at the CSS-University of Jordan, with Ana Blazevic for Nova TV in Croatia.





Hoćemo li raditi do 67 godine života?
Prijedlozi MMF-a za Hrvatsku nisu nimalo popularni. Zato smo pričali s radnicima, sindikalistima, ekonomskim stručnjacima, ali i stanovnicima Zambije i Jordana.


(Translation) Are we going to work up to 67 years of age?
IMF suggestions for Croatia are not at all popular. So we talked with workers, unions, economic experts, but also residents of Zambia and Jordan.

For more view at:

http://provjereno.dnevnik.hr/clanak/provjereno/hocemo-li-raditi-do-67-godine-zivota.htmlhttp://provjereno.dnevnik.hr/clanak/provjereno/hocemo-li-raditi-do-67-godine-zivota.html

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

ENRICHING THE MIDDLE EAST’S ECONOMIC FUTURE CONFERENCE 14TH DOHA FORUM (MAY 12-14, 2014), QATAR


PrintE-mail
Copyright: Research Institute for European and American Studies, 
Athens, Greece


Dr. John Nomikos, Director of RIEAS and Ms Antonia Dimou, senior RIEAS 

advisor participated in the 14th Doha Forum and Enriching the Middle
East's Economic future conference which wrapped up ceremonies on 
the 14th of May, concluding two days of talks which focused on the 
year’s international economic developments. 

Held at Ritz Carlton-Doha, the Forum co-sponsored by the Center for 

Middle East Development of the UCLA attracted 700 high-profile 
delegates from around the world including a number of business 
leaders. 

Doha Forum and Enriching the Middle East's Economic future conference 

convened a workshop at Al Mukhtasar-1 titled "Eastern Mediterranean 
Energy Discoveries: Opportunities and Challenges" moderated by 
Ms Dimou and with Dr. Nomikos being one of the major speakers.  














Photo No 1:

Workshop on East Med energy - Family speakers photo: 

From R to L: John Gauci-Maistre, Chairman, GM Corporate and Fiduciary 

Services, Saadet Gülden Ayman, Chair, International Relations 
Department, University of Istanbul, Antonia Dimou, senior RIEAS advisor,  
Antoine Haddad, Director, Dar al-Tanmiya Ltd., Yiorghos Leventis, 
Director, International Security Forum.






















Photo No 2:

Workshop on East Med energy - Speakers Panel: 

From R to L: Dr. John Nomikos, RIEAS Director, Saadet Gülden Ayman, 

Chair, International Relations Department, University of Istanbul, 
Antonia Dimou, senior RIEAS advisor, Yiorghos Leventis, Director, 
International Security Forum, Antoine Haddad, Director, 
Dar al-Tanmiya Ltd., John Gauci-Maistre, Chairman, GM Corporate and
Fiduciary Services.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

EAST MEDITERRANEAN ENERGY DISCOVERIES:OPPORTUNITIES FOR GREECE AND EUROPE

Antonia Dimou
(Center for Strategic Studies (CSS), University of Jordan & RIEAS Senior Advisor)

John Nomikos
(RIEAS Director)

Copyright: Research Institute for European and American Studies (www.rieas.gr) based in Athens, Greece. (Publication Date: 13 April 2014).





The energy findings of the East Mediterranean could ensure Europe’s energy security in terms of alternative supply sources and delivery routes. Of particular importance in the European energy security context is that a size-able proportion of confirmed discoveries are situated in the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cyprus, a EU member state, while more discoveries are on the way. ....Read more


http://rieas.gr/images/tonia15.pdf

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Clock is Ticking on Jordan’s Media and Press Reforms

By Antonia Dimou

April 3, 2014 5:00 am

Published in Sharnoff's Global Views, http://www.sharnoffsglobalviews.com/jordan-media-reforms-256/

Copyright: Sharnoff's Global Views

jordan-media-city

     Credit: Jordan Media City

Jordan’s speedy and practical steps to unleash genuine media and press reforms aim to reflect the Kingdom’s vision of comprehensive modernization and development.

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has one of the most open press and media sectors in the Middle East. Since the early days of the Arab Spring, Jordan has engaged in reforms intended at active citizenship and better governance.
The case of Jordan confirms that the relationship between press, media and political reforms is evolutionary. Political reforms entail a process of dialogue, inclusion and institution-building that needs time to flourish and likewise, the enabling environment for effective press and media takes time to develop.
The introduction of the new amended Jordanian constitution in 2011 was in line with the kingdom’s guarantee of freedom of speech and expression, and provided the amendment of the Press and Publications Law of 1998 that entered into force in June 2013 with the aim to enhance the media and press environment.
Realistically, Jordan hosts several independent newspapers, and the government has a majority stake in major daily Al-Rai, and a minority stake in the second largest in circulation nation-wide daily Al-Dustour.
The Kingdom also hosts the Jordan Media City that was launched in 2001 as the first private media city in the region with the aim to provide the regional and international media industry with state of the art technologies. Satellite dishes are allowed, and pan-Arab news channels remain popular.
Reportedly, 97 percent of households in Jordan have a television set and of those, 90 percent have satellite dishes. Networks like al-Jazeera and al-Arabiya with broadcast coverage of the political discourse and developments in the Arab world reach Jordanian viewers. The use of internet has increased and reportedly, more than 35 percent of the population has access to the web.
Legal amendments
With a royal stamp, amendments to the Press and Publications Law primarily dealt with the regulation of websites accessible in Jordan. Specifically, amendments intended to regulate websites, hold the responsible parties accountable, and place an obligation on individuals or entities interested in covering Jordan’s internal and external news to register and get licensed, lowering registration fees from JD 10,000 to JD 1,000.
Amendments contained four major changes to the original Press and Publications Law of 1998, starting with Article 49 which requires that all electronic publications, irrespective of their location of operation that publish news, press reports and comments relevant to the domestic or external affairs of Jordan must be registered and licensed with the Department of Press and Publications “by virtue of the Director’s decision.”
Article 49 provides that if an electronic publication is found to be in violation of the amended Law, the Director has the authority to block the pertinent website and close its administrative offices located in Jordan.
The second major amendment has been that of Article 38 which prohibits the publication of material that offends religious beliefs, and expands the notion of individual dignity by prohibiting the publication of “anything that includes contempt, slander, or defamation of individuals or affects their personal freedom.”
The third amendment that was made to Article 48 of the Press and Publications Law imposes a lower fine on Periodical Publications that are issued without a license, foreseeing that Publications which violate the Law will be fined an amount not less than one thousand dinars and not more than five thousand dinars.
Last but not least, the fourth major amendment provides that tribunals have jurisdiction over Press and Publications Law cases related to crimes committed either in violation of the Press and Publications Law, or against the domestic and external security of Jordan.
A new era of reform?
The amended legislation has been viewed as an institutionalized reform. Arguably, the operation of news websites and community radio stations has pushed the Kingdom’s overall reform envelope and favored the media’s engagement with local issues.
News websites have begun to focus on feature stories, provide analysis and demand action when problems are brought into the open, arousing public interest and interaction. In practical terms, the press and the media have started to act as magistrate getting rid of the stigma of one-sided news coverage by reporting extensively on cases of domestic corruption.
Most representative corruption case that was covered by the online and printed press was the one of a former intelligence chief. According to online and printed articles, Jordan’s former head intelligence for the period of 2005-2008 was sentenced to 13 years in prison on charges of embezzling public funds, money laundering and abuse of office.
The 2012 amendments to the Press and Publications Law of 1998 have meant to enhance the media and press environment. However, critics argue that implementation suffers from arbitrary classification and distribution of information by different ministries and state institutions.
Critics also complain that while the outlets for news have increased, they are often blocked from obtaining information on government policies and officials. Concurrently, there is a prevailing belief among local journalists that a “soft containment” policy is pursued by business entities in an attempt to dominate the media sector.
A recent survey conducted by Al Quds Centre for Political Studies showed that methods of soft containment on journalists are practiced by businessmen with a percentage of 69, influential figures with a percentage of 32.2, and civic society organizations with a percentage of 31.
In a coordinated effort to address press and media reform gaps, the Lower House’s Public Freedoms Committee currently works to revisit several laws governing the media, and the freedom of expression to come up with new amendments. As stipulated by the Constitution, it is feasible for the Jordanian legislative bodies to repeal or amend by October 1, 2014, all law, regulations and legislative acts relating to the constitutional amendments.
It is in this context that Jordan’s parliamentary committee has formed several teams to study the Press and Publications law in collaboration with the Jordan Press Association, the Centre for Defending the Freedom of Journalists, the government, the National Centre for Human Rights, and media entities to study the loopholes in the law and come up with a unified vision on how best to enhance press and media reforms.
The parliamentary committee also looks into the contention of various articles, including the one that gives the Press and Publications Department director the authority to block news websites that do not obtain licences in accordance with the law.  Reportedly in 2013, the access to some 250 websites was blocked as they did not register and obtain a license with the Press and Publications Directorate.
The committee also looks into technical issues like that of cancelling an article which conditions that news websites must be run by an editor-in-chief who has been a member of the Jordan Press Association for at least five years.
Looking towards the future
Undoubtedly, Jordan’s speedy and practical steps to unleash genuine media and press reforms aim to reflect the Kingdom’s vision of comprehensive modernization and development. It is in this context that Jordan engages in constant dialogue with international agencies and organizations.
A conference titled “Legal Media Dialogue” was held at the Dead Sea in March 2014 with the participation of lawmakers, journalists and legal experts to test the resolve of all stakeholders to improve freedom of the press.
Interestingly in 2013, the UN Universal Periodic Review of Jordan’s human rights record issued 18 recommendations, of which 15 were accepted by the government, substantially calling for cancelling or amending articles in the Penal Code that impose restrictions on the freedom of expression, and on amending the Press and Publications Law to ensure the full protection of freedom of speech.
Additionally, Jordan cooperates closely with the EU which previously funded UNESCO’s project titled “Enhancing Professional and Accurate Media Reporting on the Electoral Process,” and currently has extended support for a 4-year project entitled “Support to Democratisation, Civil Society and Media in Jordan.”
Notably, under an EU-Jordan agreement for the period 2013-2014, the European Commissionwill provide €10 million to Jordan to support civil society and the media. The agreement aims at strengthening democracy in Jordan through increased participation of citizens in political life and through building capacity for an independent, quality based media sector.
Similarly, Jordanian authorities and civil society coordinate with the US Agency for International development to implement the Jordan Media Strengthening Program that aims to promote sustainable and professional media system that provides citizens the information and news necessary to participate effectively in political institutions.
The program offers training opportunities for professional journalists, encourages sustainable media management practices such as for community radio, promotes skills amongst mid-career journalists, and provides targeted advice to regulatory authorities and policy makers to formulate a legal environment conducive to media reforms.
Evidently, Jordan is offered the golden opportunity, as result of preparation, consistent work, and dedication, to create blooming of reforms in the press and the media whose ability to bring about accountability and transparency is the bedrock of democratic evolutions, with no shortcuts permitted.